GMAT Argument 92重新选题
写作题目
收起The following appeared as part of a letter to the editor of a local newspaper:
“It makes no sense that in most places 15-year-olds are not eligible for their driver’s license while people who are far older can retain all of their driving privileges by simply renewing their license. If older drivers can get these renewals, often without having to pass another driving test, then 15-year-olds should be eligible to get a license. Fifteen-yearolds typically have much better eyesight, especially at night; much better hand-eye coordination; and much quicker reflexes. They are also less likely to feel confused by unexpected developments or disoriented in unfamiliar surroundings, and they recover from injuries more quickly.”
Discuss how well reasoned you find this argument. In your discussion be sure to analyze the line of reasoning and the use of evidence in the argument. For example, you may need to consider what questionable assumptions underlie the thinking and what alternative explanations or counterexamples might weaken the conclusion. You can also discuss what sort of evidence would strengthen or refute the argument, what changes in the argument would make it more logically sound, and what, if anything, would help you better evaluate its conclusion.
答题辅导
收起题目翻译
在多数地方,15岁的人不能拥有驾照而比他们大的人只要更新照片就能保留他们所有的驾驶特权,这是很不合理的。如果老的驾驶员可以不通过另一次驾驶考试就能得到更新,那么15岁的人就应该可以申请驾照。15岁的人一般拥有更好的视力,特别是在晚上;他们的手眼协调更好;他们反应更快。他们不容易在陌生环境里的迷路,也不容易被突发情况困扰,他们从伤害中恢复的也快。