GMAT Argument 105重新选题
写作题目
收起The following appeared in a memorandum sent by a vice-president of the Nadir Company to the company’s human resources department:
“Nadir does not need to adopt the costly ‘family-friendly’ programs that have been proposed, such as part-time work, work at home, and jobsharing. When these programs were made available at the Summit Company, the leader in its industry, only a small percentage of employees participated in them. Rather than adversely affecting our profitability by offering these programs, we should concentrate on offering extensive training that will enable employees to increase their productivity.”
Discuss how well reasoned you find this argument. In your discussion be sure to analyze the line of reasoning and the use of evidence in the argument. For example, you may need to consider what questionable assumptions underlie the thinking and what alternative explanations or counterexamples might weaken the conclusion. You can also discuss what sort of evidence would strengthen or refute the argument, what changes in the argument would make it more logically sound, and what, if anything, would help you better evaluate its conclusion.
答题辅导
收起题目翻译
Nadir不需要采用推荐的昂贵的家庭友好项目,诸如半日工作,在家中工作,工作共享等等。当在其行业占据龙头位置的Summit公司采用了这些项目时,它的员工只有一小部分加入了。我们与其采用这些项目来影响我们的利润,不如集中提供一些扩展培训,来使员工提供他们的生产力。