GMAT Argument 134重新选题
写作题目
收起The following appeared in a memorandum from a regional supervisor of post office operations:
"During a two-week study of postal operations, the Presto City post office handled about twice as many items as the Lento City post office, even though the cities are about the same size. Moreover, customer satisfaction appears to be higher in Presto City, since the study found fewer complaints regarding the Presto City post office. Therefore, the postmasters at these two offices should exchange assignments: the Presto City postmaster will solve the problems of inefficiency and customer dissatisfaction at the Lento City office while the Lento City postmaster learns firsthand the superior methods of Presto City."
Discuss how well reasoned you find this argument. In your discussion be sure to analyze the line of reasoning and the use of evidence in the argument. For example, you may need to consider what questionable assumptions underlie the thinking and what alternative explanations or counterexamples might weaken the conclusion. You can also discuss what sort of evidence would strengthen or refute the argument, what changes in the argument would make it more logically sound, and what, if anything, would help you better evaluate its conclusion.
答题辅导
收起题目翻译
在为期2周的邮政操作研究中,Presto城的邮局处理的项目为Lento城邮局的两倍,虽然两个城市规模差不多。而且,P城的顾客满意度看起来更高,因为研究发现的对P城邮局的抱怨要比较少。因此,两个邮局的局长应该交换位置。P城的局长将解决L城邮局的低效和顾客不满意问题,而L城的局长可以从P城学习第一手的管理方法。