GMAT Argument 30重新选题
写作题目
收起The following was excerpted from the speech of a spokesperson for Synthetic Farm Products, Inc.:
“Many farmers who invested in the equipment needed to make the switch from synthetic to organic fertilizers and pesticides feel that it would be too expensive to resume synthetic farming at this point. But studies of farmers who switched to organic farming last year indicate that their current crop yields are lower. Hence their purchase of organic farming equipment, a relatively minor investment compared to the losses that would result from continued lower crop yields, cannot justify persisting on an unwise course. And the choice to farm organically is financially unwise, given that it was motivated by environmental rather than economic concerns.”
Discuss how well reasoned you find this argument. In your discussion be sure to analyze the line of reasoning and the use of evidence in the argument. For example, you may need to consider what questionable assumptions underlie the thinking and what alternative explanations or counterexamples might weaken the conclusion. You can also discuss what sort of evidence would strengthen or refute the argument, what changes in the argument would make it more logically sound, and what, if anything, would help you better evaluate its conclusion.
答题辅导
收起题目翻译
许多农民投资了需要从合成转向有机肥料和杀虫剂的设备,他们感觉现在再恢复合成农业太昂贵了。但去年对转向有机农业的农民的研究显示他们现在的农作物产量变低了。因此他们对有机农业设备的购买费用(这笔费用比之从连续的减产中受到的损失只是一笔小的投资)不能作为坚持一个不明智行动的理由。选择有机农业的理由从经济上讲是不明智的,它是由环保而非经济利益所激发的。