TPO 第6套 综合写作题目重新选题
Communal online encyclopedias represent one of the latest resources to be found on the Internet. They are in many respects like traditional printed encyclopedias collections of articles on various subjects. What is specific to these online encyclopedias, however, is that any Internet user can contribute a new article or make an editorial change in an existing one. As a result, the encyclopedia is authored by the whole community of Internet users. The idea might sound attractive, but the communal online encyclopedias have several important problems that make them much less valuable than traditional, printed encyclopedias.
First, contributors to a communal online encyclopedia often lack academic credentials, thereby making their contributions partially informed at best and downright inaccurate in many cases. Traditional encyclopedias are written by trained experts who adhere to standards of academic rigor that nonspecialists cannot really achieve.
Second, even if the original entry in the online encyclopedia is correct, the communal nature of these online encyclopedias gives unscrupulous users and vandals or hackers the opportunity to fabricate, delete, and corrupt information in the encyclopedia. Once changes have been made to the original text, an unsuspecting user cannot tell the entry has been tampered with. None of this is possible with a traditional encyclopedia.
Third, the communal encyclopedias focus too frequently, and in too great a depth, on trivial and popular topics, which creates a false impression of what is important and what is not. A child doing research for a school project may discover that a major historical event receives as much attention in an online encyclopedia as, say, a single long-running television program. The traditional encyclopedia provides a considered view of what topics to include or exclude and contains a sense of proportion that online "democratic" communal encyclopedias do not.
Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they support/contradict specific points made in the reading passage.
There are many problems that make online encyclopedias less valuable than traditional ones
Online contributions are less accurate than that of standard experts
Unscrupulous hackers can lead undesirable changes to online encyclopedias
Communal encyclopedias may include contents that are not important
Point 1: Errors, never perfect; online, easy, corrected; traditional, remain fordecades
Point 2: Hacking; protecting; crucial, read-only format, reliable; editors, monitor,eliminate, malicious
Point 3: Limited space, reflect, range of interest; space not a issue, diversity ofinterests; strongest advantages