GMAT Argument 124重新选题
写作题目
收起The following appeared in a letter to the editor of a River City newspaper:
"The Clio Development Group should not be permitted to build a multilevel parking garage on Dock Street since most of the buildings on the block would have to be demolished. Because these buildings were erected decades ago, they have historic significance and must therefore be preserved as economic assets in the effort to revitalize a restored riverfront area. Recall how Lakesburg has benefited from business increases in its historic downtown center. Moreover, there is plenty of vacant land for a parking lot elsewhere in River City."
Discuss how well reasoned you find this argument. In your discussion be sure to analyze the line of reasoning and the use of evidence in the argument. For example, you may need to consider what questionable assumptions underlie the thinking and what alternative explanations or counterexamples might weaken the conclusion. You can also discuss what sort of evidence would strengthen or refute the argument, what changes in the argument would make it more logically sound, and what, if anything, would help you better evaluate its conclusion.
答题辅导
收起题目翻译
Clio发展商在Dock街修建多层停车场的计划不应该被批准以便加强附近地区的经济因为这个街区的大多数建筑将被摧毁。因为这些建筑都是几十年前盖的,并有历史意义所以必须被保留下来,以来成为恢复我们河畔区域经济的资源。回想L市是如何从其具有悠久历史的市中心遗产中受益的。另外,R市的其他地区还有很多空闲的停车场。