GMAT Argument 43重新选题
写作题目
收起The following appeared as part of an article in a trade publication:
“Stronger laws are needed to protect new kinds of home-security systems from being copied and sold by imitators. With such protection, manufacturers will naturally invest in the development of new home-security products and production technologies. Without stronger laws, therefore, manufacturers will cut back on investment. From this will follow a corresponding decline not only in product quality and marketability, but also in production efficiency, and thus ultimately a loss of manufacturing jobs in the industry.”
Discuss how well reasoned you find this argument. In your discussion be sure to analyze the line of reasoning and the use of evidence in the argument. For example, you may need to consider what questionable assumptions underlie the thinking and what alternative explanations or counterexamples might weaken the conclusion. You can also discuss what sort of evidence would strengthen or refute the argument, what changes in the argument would make it more logically sound, and what, if anything, would help you better evaluate its conclusion.
答题辅导
收起题目翻译
更严厉的法律将用于保护新的家庭安全系统不被模仿者复制。在这种保护下,制造商将自然地投资于新家庭安全产品和生产技术。没有严厉的法律,制造商将削减投入。这将相应的导致产品质量,市场能力甚至生产效率的降低,并最终导致该行业生产工作岗位的减少。