
GRE Argument 89重新选题
写作题目
收起The following appeared in a memo at XYZ company.
"When XYZ lays off employees, it pays Delany Personnel Firm to offer those employees assistance in creating résumés and developing interviewing skills, if they so desire. Laid-off employees have benefited greatly from Delany's services: last year those who used Delany found jobs much more quickly than did those who did not. Recently, it has been proposed that we use the less expensive Walsh Personnel Firm in place of Delany. This would be a mistake because eight years ago, when XYZ was using Walsh, only half of the workers we laid off at that time found jobs within a year. Moreover, Delany is clearly superior, as evidenced by its bigger staff and larger number of branch offices. After all, last year Delany's clients took an average of six months to find jobs, whereas Walsh's clients took nine."
Write a response in which you examine the stated and/or unstated assumptions of the argument. Be sure to explain how the argument depends on these assumptions and what the implications are for the argument if the assumptions prove unwarranted.
答题辅导
收起题目翻译
当XYZ裁员的时候,它雇佣了Delany人事公司在这些下岗员工有需要的时候为他们在写简历和提高面试技巧方面提供帮助。下岗员工从Delany的服务中极大受益:去年获得了Delany帮助的员工找工作比没有找Delany的员工快的多。最近,有提案提出用收费较少的Walsh人事公司代替Delany。这将是一个错误,因为在8年前,XYZ使用的就是Walsh,我们当时裁减的员工只有一半在一年之内找到了工作。而且,Delany显然更好,理由是它的员工更多,分支机构也更多。不论如何,去年Delany的客户平均用六个月找到工作,而Walsh的客户平均用了9个月。
